m3php.com

Current Weather: Temp: 5.7°C, Pressure: 1004.7mb, Wind speed: 0.7mph, Rain: 0.0mm at 07:13 on 22 November 200893

12 Jan, 2008

Electronic QSLing

Posted by: peter In: qsling

I’ve been thinking about writing about this for sometime but I kept pushing it to one side, there’s two main ways of doing electronic QSLing first on the scene was eQSL which provides a web based interface where you can send “photo” QSL cards to other members of the service.

The three things I like most about eQSL:

  1. Its 100% free to use, but to upload a custom picture requires a donation of a small amount.
  2. You send the other person a picture QSL card, resembles the old school paper method.
  3. To become “guaranteed” or “AG” status all you do is upload a copy of your licence simple.

OK from a design point of view I think eQSL.cc is rather ugly but this can be improved upon and isn’t exactly the end of the world, and I use eQSL a lot and make an effort to upload my log to this service every month or if its digital contacts these get sent automatically at the end of each QSO.

The downside of eQSL is that it’s not accepted for major awards from ARRL or RSGB but that’s, not too much of a problem for me not interested in it.

Next came Logbook of the World from the ARRL, to be honest I’ve hated the system from day one I think the security aspects of it is over the top, main issue being I’m not sending a photocopy of my licence and some other piece of paper to backup who I am like a passport via surface mail, I’ve had no end of problems with the mail system within the United Kingdom with things being stolen even when I’ve paid the extra to track the item and items I’ve sent never arriving at the destination.

Also requiring a certificate similar those used for the internet transactions is a bit of a joke, does sending confirmation for a contact need to be that secure? Or is it just a bit over the top? LoTW is accepted by the ARRL for awards to my knowledge unlike eQSL’s so that’s a bonus I guess.

Maybe it’s just me? I’ll be sticking to eQSL and paper cards!

2 Responses to "Electronic QSLing"

1 | Dave

January 26th, 2008 at 10:19 pm

Avatar

LoTW is very good, and well worth the effort. The security is a pain to start, but once you get used to the fact that you need to sign each batch of QSO before UL its not a big problem. If you electronic log it takes no more that 20 seconds to sign the log before you UL. While I agree it could be designed a little better, it does everything is needs to, and works well. The security is needed otherwise you just end up with a “nice to have eqsl.cc system”

2 | Thomas

February 3rd, 2008 at 8:30 pm

Avatar

i use now globalqsl.
verry easy and a realy paper-qsl …
73!

Comment Form

Flickr PhotoStream

    ICOM IC-7600ICOM DSTAR UnitICOM Van - InsideRSGB GB4FUN TrailerRSGB GB4FUN TrailerODARS Construction CompetitionOxford Broad StreetISS 2:40 passISS 2:40 pass

About

Welcome to the blog of Peter Goodhall, M3PHP who is 22 and a recent graduate after Multimedia Technology (Web Design) at Buckinghamshire New University. I'm keen about all aspects of amateur radio and run the e-learning website HamTests and recently got awarded the RSGB Kenwood Trophy.

I'm also evolved with a number of other amateur radio web applications and currently work as a freelance web developer.